Super governance reforms are defensible – but not the main game for members
Originally Published:
Friday, October 16, 2015
Jim Minifie discusses the governance reforms of superannuation.
Article Filter
Creating a mandate for retirement income reform
Originally Published:
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
It is time to revisit the superannuation policy at the most fundamental level.
Push to water down super’s trustee representative system flawed
Originally Published:
Monday, November 17, 2014
Tom Garcia, the CEO of AIST, argues that there is no systemic governance problem in not-for-profit superannuation
Superannuation Needs a Better Regulator, not More Rules
Originally Published:
Thursday, November 6, 2014
In an opinion piece first published in the Australian Financial Review, Dr Scott Donald argues that Australian superannuation needs a regulator equipped and prepared to use the powers it has.
Retirement System Begging for Reform
Originally Published:
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Patricia Pascuzzo argues that it is time to to address the undeveloped post retirement system
CLMR Working Paper 14-4: Bank Custodians and Systemic Risk in the Australian Superannuation System
Dr Scott Donald and Dr Rob Nicholls of CLMR examine the custodian sector as potential source of systemic risk in the Australian superannuation system
Originally Published:
Tuesday, July 8, 2014
The Cost Debate in Superannuation
Originally Published:
Friday, May 16, 2014
Some research doesn't warrant recycling, like the OECD analysis of the costs of private sector pension schemes.
Corporate Climate Finance for Global Sustainability?
Originally Published:
Thursday, May 8, 2014
CLMR Research Fellow Dr Megan Bowman argues the case for inclusion of 'corporate climate finance' as a necessary ingredient for global sustainability.
Making a Super Impact
Originally Published:
Thursday, November 14, 2013
A recent report highlights that many of the traditional roadblocks to super funds and charities investing in social enterprises have been overcome.
Behind Closed Doors: APRA and Enforceable Undertakings
Originally Published:
Sunday, October 27, 2013
Does APRA’s acceptance of enforceable undertakings in Trio mean that its loss of disqualification power over individuals has driven its processes behind closed doors and made APRA less accountable?