The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has proposed changes to the funding of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) which will continue to provide important reassurance to consumers but could reduce the likelihood of interim levies and offer firms more certainty in the level of fees they pay. The FSCS provides compensation for customers if a regulated financial services firm goes out of business or cannot pay claims made against it.  The scheme is funded by contributions from regulated firms based on the type of business they carry out (their funding class). The current funding model has been in place since April 2008 but during that time there have been significant payouts, resulting in sizable levies for some funding classes. However, the last four years have proven that in terms of consumer confidence it is absolutely vital to have a compensation scheme in place. The consultation paper puts forward a credible funding approach balancing the need for adequacy of funds with affordability for those contributing. The main features are:

• Two separate approaches for funding FSCS’ costs; one for activities we expect will be subject to the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) funding rules for the FSCS, such as deposit takers and insurance providers, and one for the other activities we expect will be subject to the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) funding rules. There would be no cross-subsidy between the two;

• No changes to the current funding classes;

• A retail pool made up of all classes we expect to be subject to the FCA’s funding rules which would be triggered if one or more FCA classes reached their annual threshold (i.e. the limit that funding class would be expected to contribute in any one year);

• Revised annual thresholds based on assessments of affordability, and;

The FSCS to consider potential compensation costs expected in the 36 months following the levy instead of twelve months as is currently the case (except for the deposit class).  This should smooth the impact of levies and may make levy requirements more predictable than now.